Themes such as belonging, division, resentment and appreciation emerge from first 20 conversations
Nov. 2, 2026
By Ray Salvatore Jennings
The Community Listening Project is a citizen-led initiative bringing together volunteers to talk with residents of different backgrounds and perspectives about their experiences of living in Blue Hill. The project is co-organized by Ray Jennings and Kim Parrott. Ray has spent more than 30 years working with communities in over 50 countries, including places experiencing conflict and political change. Kim is an executive coach and facilitator whose work focuses on leadership development and strengthening relationships within teams and organizations. Together with fellow volunteers, they are listening to what people value about life in Blue Hill, how residents experience belonging and connection, and the hopes and concerns they hold for the community's future.
At a time when differences of opinion receive plenty of attention, a Community Listening Project began in Blue Hill to explore the everyday experiences behind those views. Project members have been sitting down with people of different ages, occupations, and political leanings, from families who have been here for generations to people who arrived more recently. This article shares early takeaways from those conversations, without attributing responses to individuals, in the hope that readers will recognize familiar experiences and glimpse aspects of life here that differ from their own.
The interviews explore why people live in Blue Hill and what they value about the town. Where do they naturally cross paths with others? What traditions bring people together, and when have they seen neighbors pull together? Other questions concern what worries them, where they feel connected or left out, whether they feel heard, and what small change would make daily life better. Each conversation ends with two questions: who else should the project be listening to, and what should the interviewers have asked but didn't?
The project is still young. These first 20 conversations cannot establish what the whole community thinks. But several themes recur: attachment to the beauty and character of this place, appreciation for neighbors who help during hardship, concern about affordability, differing experiences of belonging and being heard, and divisions of class, history, and politics.
People speak about the landscape, the water, the quiet, and the satisfaction of living somewhere with a distinct character. Many have family roots here; others came to raise children, run a business, or build a life around farming, music, art, or the outdoors.
“Longtime residents sometimes feel that their knowledge and ways of life are undervalued; newer arrivals, meanwhile, can find established circles difficult to enter. ”
For some, belonging was there from childhood. For others, it grew slowly. One participant described initially missing the anonymity of life elsewhere, then coming to value the familiar encounters and relationships that once felt uncomfortable. Being known can take some getting used to.
That affection exists alongside frustration. Some describe a close and welcoming community, while others see separate social groups with limited contact. Longtime residents sometimes feel that their knowledge and ways of life are undervalued; newer arrivals, meanwhile, can find established circles difficult to enter. The same town can feel familiar and welcoming to one person and difficult to find a place in for another.
Participants also spoke about economic and political divisions. Several described a divide between those who work here for a living and those who can afford not to. Some saw those differences even among schoolchildren, contrasting children who attend summer camp with those who need summer jobs. Some longtime residents expressed resentment toward newcomers they see as changing the town to suit themselves. Political tension also came up, from arguments in local coffee shops to anger directed at people holding signs on Main Street.
Yet when asked about occasions when people pull together, participants repeatedly turn to similar experiences. One described what happens after a house fire: neighbors do laundry and bring more food than the household could possibly eat.
“Several described a divide between those who work here for a living and those who can afford not to. Some saw those differences even among schoolchildren.”
Others recall meals arriving during illness, food delivered to people unable to leave home and help after storms or a death in the family. One account recalls families raising money for the Blue Hill playground, buying equipment, and helping install it. Another describes neighbors answering a call to help put a farm’s rolling greenhouse back on its tracks.
People with very different views of town life recognize this willingness to respond when someone nearby needs them. Practical generosity is one of the clearest points of connection in the conversations so far.
Everyday encounters matter, too. The post office and grocery store appear often, alongside the library, YMCA, churches, workplaces, and school events. The Blue Hill Fair, parades, music, dances, and sports provide other occasions to gather. Several participants fondly recall Blue Hill Days and miss the opportunities it offered for townspeople to come together.
These are places where an errand becomes a conversation, where people meet someone outside their usual circle, or where familiarity develops over time. A person seen regularly becomes someone to greet, then perhaps someone to ask after. Much of this happens without anyone arranging it.
Participation is not equally easy for everyone. Work schedules, transportation, family responsibilities, and hearing difficulties can limit opportunities to join in. Some younger participants want more to do later in the day. One suggested simply keeping things open an hour later; another noted the lack of entertainment after seven. Several people would welcome more places to gather.
“Several participants fondly recall Blue Hill Days and miss the opportunities it offered for townspeople to come together.”
Affordability is another recurring concern. Housing prices, rents, property taxes, groceries, and the general cost of living come up repeatedly. Participants ask how young adults, families, and people working locally can make a life here. Others worry about growing older and being able to stay. These concerns give a practical meaning to belonging: whether there will be a place here for someone at the next stage of life.
What to do about it is less settled. Calls for more housing sit alongside worries about development, growth, or additional municipal costs. Questions about schools, the hospital, land conservation, and town spending carry similar tensions. Financial concerns recur among people with differing outlooks, whether they are thinking about a household budget, a business, or their children's future here. Proposed changes also raise questions about preserving a landscape and way of life people value.
The question "Do you feel heard?" brings contrasting experiences into view. Many participants say yes. They describe friendships, civic involvement, and relationships through which their views receive attention. A few acknowledge that longstanding connections or a particular role give them access and influence.
Other responses are less assured. One younger participant describes town life as largely shaped around older people. Some question how welcoming local government feels or whether attending a town meeting will make any difference.
Feeling known and feeling heard are not quite the same. Someone may have familiar faces all around them and still wonder whether their concerns carry weight. This is an important area for further listening, especially among people who are less connected or whose schedules leave little time to participate.
Suggestions for improving daily life are often concrete: safer walking routes, better parking, transportation options, accessible childcare, more convenient town hall hours, clearer ways to raise concerns with local government, and more places to gather. Fond recollections of Blue Hill Days also suggest an interest in town-wide events that appeal to people of different ages and backgrounds. These are ideas emerging from the conversations, rather than recommendations adopted by the project.
“Several people also spoke of civility as one of the town’s strengths, describing a willingness not to let larger divisions take hold here. Some feel that it is fraying; others feel it is holding. ”
What stands out is how often affection and concern appear together. Worries about the cost of staying accompany a desire to make a life here. Questions about change accompany attachment to the place. Across differing political views, livelihoods, and histories, people describe appreciation for the landscape, local skills and traditions, independence, and neighbors who help one another. One participant pointed to the practical knowledge still found here: people who can cut wood, fix cars, and grow food.
Respect also comes up in different ways. A few participants speak about wanting to express a view without being dismissed. Many describe feeling listened to and valued within their friendships and community activities. These accounts suggest that how a conversation unfolds can matter alongside the issue being discussed.
Several people also spoke of civility as one of the town's strengths, describing a willingness not to let larger divisions take hold here. Some feel that it is fraying; others feel it is holding. That difference may be one of the most important things to keep listening for.
These first conversations suggest that knowing where someone stands on a town issue tells only part of their story. Hearing what they value, what worries them, and how they experience daily life here adds another dimension. People who disagree about what the town should do may still cherish the same things about living here.
More interviews are planned, with particular attention to including people of different ages, livelihoods, incomes, political views, and histories in Blue Hill, including those less involved in organized community life. The project aims to share a fuller account of what emerges after this next round of listening. This is a citizen-led effort, separate from any town visioning or planning process. To share your views, recommend someone, or help with the effort, please contact Kim Parrot at kimberlyhparrott@gmail.com.
The Rising Tide welcomes letters and opinion pieces from a wide variety of viewpoints. Please review our guidelines for helpful tips on what we look for in letters and opinions. Published pieces do not reflect the editorial stance of The Rising Tide or its board, and are not endorsements. To submit a piece to us, email info@risingtide.media.
